W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: tabindex

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 15:04:59 +1000
Message-ID: <53EEE67B.8020306@mcc.id.au>
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
Rik Cabanier wrote:
> That makes sense and I think the spec should call that out.
> Didn't we at some point discuss what should happen with tabindex in
> symbols? It seems 'tree order' is not enough.

I don't recall that discussion (doesn't mean it didn't happen) but I 
would expect that it should do the same thing as tabindex used inside 
shadow trees.
Received on Saturday, 16 August 2014 05:05:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:19 UTC