W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: moving getSVGDocument to the HTML spec

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:31:02 +0000
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D5016D42-36A1-459A-8391-C3E8F246BC0A@adobe.com>
Fine with me.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 5, 2014, at 2:32 PM, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> The getSVGDocument method, which we've marked as deprecated, is now defined to be an alias for contentDocument.  In this thread http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2013-November/253271.html and this bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25940 some people mentioned that it would be easier if this was defined in HTML alongside the definition of contentDocument itself.  We would need to copy the more detailed wording about browsing contexts etc. if we kept it in SVG.
> Are there any objections to moving it to the HTML spec?  I don't think there is any particular advantage to keeping this wart in the SVG spec.
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 15:31:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:19 UTC