Re: SVG Meeting?

Hi, Folks-

We're also having some W3C Team-internal discussions about our ISO PAS 
submission process, and clarifying for our own purposes issues around 
how much effort it takes (e.g. team or WG time) and realistic timelines; 
there are some conflicting data and opinions, and I want to be sure that 
we understand the realities and that we are conveying the best 
information to you folks. This might take a little bit; we'll keep you 
posted.

I'd also like to make it clear that this isn't a particularly urgent 
topic; we've waited for a while on this, and we can start the process at 
any time. We don't want it to fall off our radar, and it would be good 
to have resolution on whether to submit SVG 1.1 or SVG 2 in a reasonable 
timeframe. But to do that, we need to look at the various constraints, 
costs, and benefits, and to have an accurate understanding of what's 
involved. There might also be political factors we should consider (ISO 
can be a battleground), and we should avoid as many of those as 
possible; after all, the goal is to break down barriers for SVG 
adoption, not introduce new ones. :)

So, I'd like to ask if the SVG WG can hold on this until Chris and I 
have some better info. Is this okay?

Also, Chris and I are happy to talk to anyone about their own 
experiences and concerns with ISO offline.

Regards-
-Doug

On 7/18/13 7:42 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> If we are to have that discussion I would prefer that discussion be
> delayed to next week as I will be unable to attend today.
>
> Rich
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 11:20 PM, "Rik Cabanier" <cabanier@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a SVG meeting tomorrow.
>>
>> If so, I'd like to have a short discussion on the ISO submission
> plan. If not, we can do it next week.
>>
>> Rik
>

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 14:11:55 UTC