W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: publishing SVG 2 WD

From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:56:58 +0100
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wsvgc8thdhsuf5@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:48:28 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:

> I wanted to sign off on SVG 2 as it is currently so that we can publish  
> another WD of it.  I meant to add that to the agenda for last week but  
> forgot.
>
> Could people who are interested in reviewing to make sure they are happy  
> with the WD publication please read through the parts changed since the  
> FPWD -- they should all have been marked with a yellow background,  
> class="ready-for-wg-review" -- so that we can resolve to publish at the  
> next telcon?  (There is no handy index, I'm afraid, although you could  
> perform a diff of the changes.html appendix to get a high level  
> overview.  I still need to do the work to separate that out into  
> "changes since SVG 1.1 SE" and "changes since the last WD".)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cameron

There are some minor editorial things I think would be good to fix before  
publishing, such as making sure the produced spec text doesn't contain e.g  
"@@ unknown element/term". The changes appendix needs to be updated too,  
it's not "changes since SVG 1.1", it should be changes since the last SVG2  
WD.

Apart from that I think it's good to go.


-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 19:57:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:16 UTC