W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: SVG 2 requirements with annotations in the spec but no owner

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:53:49 +1000
Message-ID: <50302B0D.5030200@mcc.id.au>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
CC: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Dirk Schulze:
> I would disagree. This is just the FPWD. So there might still be changes and some ideas might still be addressed in the next WD. For instance "Arbitrary fills for shapes" was something that I want to bring up on the next SVG WG discussion. Also, what does "remove" mean? I thought we want to keep the annotations in our source code for documentation reasons?

OK, but I was hoping the annotations to be an accurate representation of 
what features people in the group had signed up to work on.

I've made the annotations corresponding to requirements be visible by 
default in the about-to-be-published WD.
Received on Saturday, 18 August 2012 23:54:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 August 2012 23:54:20 GMT