W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Status of SVG 2 requirements and commitments

From: Cyril Concolato <Cyril.Concolato@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:55:16 +0000
To: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <54EF1DA3171CEE48AD59D7FF0DE043C35A5DE834@exm02-wvp.cisra.canon.com.au>
Hi all,

Following today's telcon, I've updated the requirements page [1] to include the latest agreed requirements. I think the page is complete (but for the 4 late requirements [2]). Out of the 179 proposed requirements, we have 134 yes, 45 no and 2 maybe .

I've also updated the commitments page [3]. It contains 137 entries and so far 9 people have committed themselves to 57 entries.

Cyril

[1] www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input
[2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input#Late_Proposed_Requirements

[3] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Commitments


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cyril Concolato [mailto:Cyril.Concolato@cisra.canon.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, 23 March 2012 2:18 PM
> To: SVG WG
> Subject: RE: commitments to work on SVG 2 features
>
> Hi all,
>
> Following today's telcon, Nikos and I have worked on a new wiki page [1] to
> gather the commitments to work on the requirements. It should be more
> readable and easier to see what everyone will be working on. Please add your
> commitment as Cameron indicated to this page [1].
>
> The page also indicates our guess, for each requirement, if a written proposal
> should be made or if someone can go and edit the spec (ACTION-3253). It
> should give a better understanding of the work to be done.
>
> The page was created based on other wiki pages and on previous resolutions. It
> may contain errors or miss requirements, hopefully not too many. For instance
> I don't know what to do with the <canvas> question that Alex raised [2]. So feel
> free, to add more with a link to a resolution and to fix the mistakes if any.
>
> Regards,
> Cyril
>
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Commitment

> s
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2012JanMar/0081.html

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au]
> > Sent: Friday, 23 March 2012 8:50 AM
> > To: SVG WG
> > Subject: commitments to work on SVG 2 features
> >
> > As we discussed in the telcon today, we are now (basically) at the
> > point where we want to prioritise the list of requirements we have for
> > SVG 2, since we obviously will not be able to work on all >100
> > accepted requirements within a reasonable timeframe.  We will be doing
> > this by having each of us, SVG WG members, put our hands up to commit
> > to working on specific requirements -- that includes developing a
> > proposal (if one is required), doing spec edits, and working on tests.
> > Cyril has placed "Commitment" below each accepted requirement on
> > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input and
> > that's where you can put your name.
> >
> > Let's aim for having our commitments entered by next telcon, 29 March.
> >
> > Note that our timeframe we have on
> > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Planning_Page is to have a
> > LCWD by January 2013, so 9 months away.  Consider how many features
> > you will be able to drive to spec text completion by that time.  (Some
> > feature requests will obviously be more work than others, so make sure
> > to take that into consideration too.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cameron
>
> The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be
> confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you
> are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying
> of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email
> in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the
> information from your system.
The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 22:56:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:14 UTC