W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

CSS Properties defined by other specs

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:53:59 -0700
To: "public-svg-wg@w3.org WG" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9A5A6637-D3C7-4764-AE9D-0EFAA51A8EEC@adobe.com>
Hi WG,

I just submitted the first batch of changes to the coordinate and units section and have some questions.

At the moment there is a section about "The 'transform' property". I want to come back to a thread of Cameron. Cameron asked if we add a note with a link the the definition of a property, if it is defined by a CSS spec. This is the case for the 'transform' property [1]. Should I still add the complete table with description of name, values, computed values, initial value and so on? At the moment I just have the name, and the information that it is animatable. Is that enough? If not, how do we handle the case that a property definition changes on the CSS side?

What is with the properties 'transform-origin', 'perspective', 'perspective-origin', 'back face-visibility' and 'transform-style'. Do they need to be mentioned in SVG 2.0?


[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 18:10:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:14 UTC