- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:57:23 +1000
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Dirk Schulze: > Have you seen the discussion on public-fx? I would not use it at this point of time. I had not; thanks for pointing it out. By the way, the SVG 1.1 Second Edition spec (as well as the Web IDL and HTML5 specs) use small amounts of JS to enhance their presentation, but they are presentable just fine without them. Recent pubrules (a couple of months back?) allow SVG and MathML in specs now, as long as there is a fallback. The use of MathJax is an acceptable fallback IMO. I similarly replaced a couple of PNG figures directly with their SVG versions, referenced by <img>. I haven't added in the fallback yet. My feeling is that using SVG 1.1 (without filters, and perhaps without SMIL animation) should be acceptable for diagrams/examples in the SVG 2 spec.
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 09:58:00 UTC