W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Paint keywords

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:46:31 +1200
Message-ID: <4E56C2B7.4060203@mcc.id.au>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On 26/08/11 3:16 AM, Chris Lilley wrote:
> (now back from lengthy vacation/convalescence)

(WB!)

> So, I'm seeing some agreement and no disagreement on adding these.
> Cameron seems to be suggesting adding these to SVG Color, which I can
> of course easily do, but I was proposing these for core SVG2 in
> fact.

OK.  I think I misremembered the discussion during Seattle -- it was in 
the context of Vector Effects that we were discussing these keywords, 
not SVG Color.  I am definitely in favour of having these in SVG 2 itself.

> Which brings us, in terms of next steps, to:
>
> CM>  * Review process for making changes to SVG 2

We resolved at the F2F to include these keywords in SVG 2:

http://www.w3.org/2011/07/29-svg-minutes.html#item02

Erik has an action to collect all the resolve-to-put-in-SVG-2 items from 
recent calls/F2Fs into the wiki, so that should get added soon to the 
table of features and owners in 
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements#Feature_Owners.

Chris you also have an action to write spec text for the proposal, 
ACTION-3094.  I'm wondering whether that is useful to do at this point 
given that we haven't made any progress on writing any SVG 2 spec text yet.

Do you think there is anything more to write up than is in 
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Proposals/Vector_effects to 
define the functionality fully?
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:47:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:13 UTC