W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Paint keywords

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:46:31 +1200
Message-ID: <4E56C2B7.4060203@mcc.id.au>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On 26/08/11 3:16 AM, Chris Lilley wrote:
> (now back from lengthy vacation/convalescence)


> So, I'm seeing some agreement and no disagreement on adding these.
> Cameron seems to be suggesting adding these to SVG Color, which I can
> of course easily do, but I was proposing these for core SVG2 in
> fact.

OK.  I think I misremembered the discussion during Seattle -- it was in 
the context of Vector Effects that we were discussing these keywords, 
not SVG Color.  I am definitely in favour of having these in SVG 2 itself.

> Which brings us, in terms of next steps, to:
> CM>  * Review process for making changes to SVG 2

We resolved at the F2F to include these keywords in SVG 2:


Erik has an action to collect all the resolve-to-put-in-SVG-2 items from 
recent calls/F2Fs into the wiki, so that should get added soon to the 
table of features and owners in 

Chris you also have an action to write spec text for the proposal, 
ACTION-3094.  I'm wondering whether that is useful to do at this point 
given that we haven't made any progress on writing any SVG 2 spec text yet.

Do you think there is anything more to write up than is in 
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Proposals/Vector_effects to 
define the functionality fully?
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:47:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:46 UTC