W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: SVG 2 and its Mercurial repositories

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:27:10 +1200
Message-ID: <4E3895DE.50604@mcc.id.au>
To: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On 3/08/11 1:20 AM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> I'm not sure why you feel having the "rational" sections inline in the
> spec source would increase the likelihood of that information becoming
> out of date. To me it seems more likely that anyone editing the text
> will see the rational section and update it as necessary too if it's
> inline, rather than in a separate file or wiki page.

OK, maybe I was overstating the risk.  We can try doing this.  It would 
be for:

   * changes in normative requirements from SVG 1.1
   * changes to new features that based on WG decisions (but not for the
     normal evolution of the feature as it is developed)

Does that sound right?
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 00:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:13 UTC