W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: rotated path segment proposal

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:46:14 -0700
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA5315A3.6DA8%lrosenth@adobe.com>
Wouldn't it be easier to just have two separate segments, and then just
change the rotation on the second??   Why would you need a single segment?

I simply don't see enough of a use case for this to SIGNIFICANTLY break
backwards compatibility by adding new operators to the path segment
format.  Do we even have any idea what such an addition to do to existing
solutions when they encountered this??


On 7/23/11 10:27 PM, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:

>Hello WG.
>I put some text on the wiki for my rotated path segment proposal:
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 16:46:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:13 UTC