- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:49:21 +0100
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 24, 2011, at 23:20 , Cameron McCormack wrote: > If we want to ensure every substantial change gets review, then RTC is > probably a better model. Not necessarily. What you need with CTR is a way of tracking which commits have actually been reviewed. Using a VCS that's not necessarily very complicated. You can get hg to send an email to a list whenever there's a commit, and say that the review process is that one must reply to that commit email with a review. It's then fairly easy to see which commits have been reviewed and which haven't. Bonus: it's all archived as email, which is easy to handle. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Friday, 25 March 2011 09:49:57 UTC