Re: PDF version of the spec

Robin Berjon:
> It looks really nice, good job!

Thanks!

> Just one small question: do we have an issue with the fact it links
> to a commercial vendor with a little ad logo (Prince)? I can't say
> I have a strong feeling about this, but I can see how it might
> create discomfort to some. Maybe W3C could get a pro licence for the
> conversion of its own specs? I think we might know someone there...

It’s a good question.  Prince is pretty awesome, and it’s Melbourne-
made, so I don’t have a problem promoting them personally. :-)  But I
can certainly see that others might not like it.  Can you suggest
someone at W3C to contact about this?

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 20:52:04 UTC