conform-viewers-02-f unapproved

Minutes:
> conform-viewers-12-f
> 
>    ChrisL: I think this is incorrect
> 
>    [41]http://www.w3.org/mid/1801756505.20110119200752@w3.org
> 
>      [41] http://www.w3.org/mid/1801756505.20110119200752@w3.org
> 
>    <ChrisL> And I think the test is wrong, because the data UIR scheme
>    allows for a content-type but not a content-encoding; thus the test
>    conflicts with
> 
>    <ChrisL>
>    [42]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/conform.html#Confor
>    mingSVGServers
> 
>      [42] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/conform.html#ConformingSVGServers
> 
>    ChrisL: this was a big point of contention in the IETF review of the
>    svg media type
>    ... a dataURI has a mime-type, but not content-encoding
>    ... only way to change that would be to change dataURI spec
> 
>    <scribe> ACTION: heycam to mark conform-viewers-02-f as unapproved
>    [recorded in
>    [43]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/19-svg-minutes.html#action05]
> 
>    <trackbot> Created ACTION-2929 - Mark conform-viewers-02-f as
>    unapproved [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-01-26].

I’ve done this now.  I removed the entry from manifest.dat, but didn’t
regenerate any the harnesses – is it safe for me to do that, or will the
htmlObjectMini one not get generated?

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 03:10:07 UTC