W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Summary of discussion about FX work items

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:50:43 +1200
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110623025043.GB7924@wok.mcc.id.au>
Tab Atkins Jr.:
> Yup, I have a plan for making paint servers usable as CSS <image>s,
> and conversely for making CSS <image>s usable as SVG paint servers,
> based on experimental work by roc.  Merging the two into a single
> cross-language concept is surprisingly easy, and makes me happy.

Cool.

> I'm happy for the first part to live in the CSS Image Values spec, but
> I'm not sure where to put the second part.  It seems like SVG would be
> a better place to define it.

Yeah, I think so too.  I’m not sure that we need a joint spec just for
paint values.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 02:51:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 June 2011 02:51:20 GMT