W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Question on filters-morph-01-f.svg

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:14:01 +0100
Message-ID: <925915054.20101208171401@w3.org>
To: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, "Jim Barr (WINDOWS)" <jbarr@microsoft.com>
On Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 4:57:36 PM, Patrick wrote:

PD> I wasn't sure if this was an official test as part of the SVG 1.1
PD> 2nd edition test suite,

looking at the source, I see
reviewer="SVGWG" author="Jon Ferraiolo" status="accepted"

so this is an accepted test.

PD>  but it does not have a draft watermark .

PD> It appears that generated PNG has a red color instead of the
PD> orange (ff8000).  Has this reference image been generated recently?

PD> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlEmbed/filters-morph-01-f.html

Looking at
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-morph-01-f.svg

the test was edited Tue Nov 30 03:48:58 2010 UTC (8 days, 12 hours ago) by cmccorma (Cameron) with edit log message "reduce red".

The reference image therefore corresponds to the state of the test before the last edit (you can also see that the reference has revision 1.6 and the test, 1.8).

(You can get the cvs log of a file on dev.w3.org by appending 
",cvslog" (without the quotes, with the comma) to the url. Like this

http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-morph-01-f.svg,cvslog


-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 16:14:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 December 2010 16:14:53 GMT