W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: animate-elem-82 (related to ISSUE-2083)

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:46:46 +0100
Message-ID: <1493237059.20101118174646@w3.org>
To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Thursday, November 18, 2010, 10:32:38 AM, Erik wrote:

ED> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:54:08 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
ED> wrote:

>> Erik Dahlstrom:
>>> I went ahead and made the change[3], it can be reverted if there are
>>> any objections.

>> Do you need port back the definitions for paced animation from 1.2T to
>> 1.1?

ED> Sure, if the group agrees that the clarifications for paced animation from
ED> 1.2T should be included then I can take that action, no problem.

Yes, those are useful clarifications.





-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:47:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:47:10 GMT