- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:34:27 +0100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:32:44 +0200, Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com> wrote: ... > The following test cases include SMIL, which either is not integral to > the tests, or should be renamed/categorized as animate- > paths-dom-02-f.svg That test is not using smil, and is not complete/reviewed yet. What's your suggested new naming scheme for the tests that depend on declarative animation? Here's my proposal: pservers-grad-19-b.svg -> animate-pservers-grad-01-b.svg The criteria being that any test where declarative animation is a required part prefix the old name with 'animate-' and restart the numbering from 1. The test that are up for renaming are listed below. There are a few more in the filters section, a rough estimate of the total number of approved tests that are likely to be affected: 10-20. > struct-dom-08-f.svg Animation isn't integral to this test. Would trying to use window.setTimeout (if it exists) be ok? And if setTimeout is not found fallback to using an animate element. This is one of the tests for SVG 1.1F2 spec changes. > interact-events-203-t.svg > interact-pevents-07-t.svg For these tests I would like to see an equivalent test using script. > interact-pevents-02-t.svg No objections to renaming. There's an equivalent script-based test already: interact-pevents-01-b.svg. > interact-pevents-201-t.svg No objections to renaming. There's an equivalent script-based test already: interact-pevents-08-f.svg > interact-pevents-202-t.svg No objections to renaming. There's an equivalent script-based test already: interact-pevents-09-f.svg > script-elem-01-b.svg > struct-dom-09-b.svg > pservers-grad-19-b.svg No objections to renaming. Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 15:35:02 UTC