W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: review comments on interact-pointer-04-f.svg

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:20:59 +1300
To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20101101002058.GE28301@wok.mcc.id.au>
Erik Dahlstrom:
> I think opacity on mask is a specialcase. It's a container element
> sure, but it's special in that it never renders directly to the
> canvas[1], so one could argue that since the mask is never rendered
> directly the opacity shouldn't apply to the mask element[2][3].

True.  You might think of opacity as being a directive for how the
parent element should composite the child.

> Btw shouldn't [2] be saying "How container elements are rendered"
> instead of "How groups are rendered"?

Seems like.  Feel free to change it, I’d say.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 00:21:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 November 2010 00:21:37 GMT