W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

RE: review comments on struct-cond-overview-02-f.svg

From: Sandy Roberts <sandro@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:43:17 +0000
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E04A544F27492D43988EC043C042339F5D8FB46F@TK5EX14MBXC130.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Hi Cameron,

It seems to be that this would be better as a separate test instead of adding it to struct-cond-overview-02-f.svg.  It falls a little outside the scope of the original test case.  I don't mind making a case for it though.

Thanks!
Sandy Roberts

-----Original Message-----
From: public-svg-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-svg-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cameron McCormack
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:01 PM
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Subject: review comments on struct-cond-overview-02-f.svg

The test is fine, but I would like to see sub-tests that check that a <use> element referencing a child element (without a conditional
attribute) of some element that does have a failing conditional attribute is rendered.  Something like

  <g systemLanguage="BAD">
    <rect id="r" y="-500" width="100" height="100" fill="green"/>
  </g>
  <use xlink:href="#r" y="500"/>

(The trick with the y just to make sure that the actual green rect isn’t rendered, in case the systemLanguage is ignored.)

--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/



Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:45:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:45:44 GMT