W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Minutes, 21 Oct 2010 SVG WG telcon

From: Anthony Grasso <Anthony.Grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:45:51 +0000
To: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <923A4276C1903646BE5299CA8462B0A005DCCB@EXM02-WVP.cisra.canon.com.au>
http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-svg-minutes.html

---

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                   SVG Working Group Teleconference

21 Oct 2010

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-svg-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Shepazu, [IPcaller], ed, pdengler, adrianba, anthony

   Regrets
   Chair
          Erik

   Scribe
          anthony

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Update on test suite status page
         2. [5]TPAC
     * [6]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________

   <trackbot> Date: 21 October 2010

   <scribe> Scribe: anthony

   <scribe> ScribeNick: anthony

Update on test suite status page

   AG: I generated one the other day - can't remember exactly

   ED: Can you do another run?

   AG: Yes
   ... will do that at the end of the telcon

   ED: PD do you know how many have been reviewed?

   PD: No I don't

   <pdengler>
   [7]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/test_suite_statu
   s.html

      [7] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/test_suite_status.html

   PD: I thought Heycam sent some comments to the list regarding blank
   tests

   AG: I thought they were general guidelines on creating tests

   <pdengler> Send them to the mailing so we can all see and resolve

   <heycam> sure thing

   <pdengler> I am searching for these tests :
   coords-transformattr-03-f,coords-transformattr-04-f,coords-transform
   attr-05-f,imp-path-01-f,imp-path-01-f,interact-pevents-10-f,interact
   -pointer-04-f,linking-a-10-f,masking-mask-02-f,masking-path-12-f,mas
   king-path-13-f,masking-path-14-f,painting-marker-07-f,painting-marke
   r-08-f,painting-marker-properties-01-f,pservers-grad-23-f,pservers-g
   rad-24-f,pservers-grad-st

   <pdengler>
   ops-01-f,pservers-pattern-04-f,pservers-pattern-05-f,pservers-patter
   n-06-f,struct-cond-overview-02-f,struct-cond-overview-03-f,struct-co
   nd-overview-04-f,struct-dom-16-f.svg,struct-dom-17-f.svg
   ,struct-dom-18-f.svg ,struct-dom-19-f.svg
   ,struct-use-14-f,struct-use-14-f.svg,struct-use-15-f,struct-use-15-f
   .svg
   ,styling-class-01-f,styling-css-09-f,styling-pres-03-f,styling-pres-
   04-f,styling-pres-05-f

   <pdengler>
   ,text-fonts-05-f,types-dom-svgfittoviewbox-01-f,types-dom-svglengthl
   ist-01-f,types-dom-svgnumberlist-01-f,types-dom-svgstringlist-01-f,t
   ypes-dom-svgtransformable-01-f,

   <pdengler> on the status page and not seeing them, but I am not done
   yet

   ED: The ones that have been reviewed
   ... we can go over those quickly

   <ed>
   [8]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/coords-transformatt
   r-03-f.svg

      [8] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/coords-transformattr-03-f.svg

   ED: Any objections to moving it to accepted

   <ed>
   [9]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/coords-transformatt
   r-04-f.svg

      [9] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/coords-transformattr-04-f.svg

   ED: Ok, move it to accepted
   ... I think the pass criteria and the pass description should be
   moved
   ... but I can do that

   <ed>
   [10]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-felem-02-f
   .svg

     [10] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-felem-02-f.svg

   <ed>
   [11]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/imp-path-01-f.svg

     [11] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/imp-path-01-f.svg

   ED: Any objections to filtes-felem-02?
   ... Ok, mark it as accepted

   <ed>
   [12]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/linking-a-10-f.svg

     [12] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/linking-a-10-f.svg

   ED: imp-path-01 is ok
   ... accept that one

   <ed>
   [13]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/linking-frag-01-f.
   svg

     [13] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/linking-frag-01-f.svg

   ED: linking-a-10-f is ok
   ... accept that one
   ... linking-frag-01 is on just created

   AG: Still needs review

   <ed>
   [14]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/masking-mask-02-f.
   svg

     [14] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/masking-mask-02-f.svg

   ED: Skip that one
   ... masking-mask-02 is ok

   <ed>
   [15]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/masking-path-11-b.
   svg

     [15] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/masking-path-11-b.svg

   ED: accept that one

   <ed>
   [16]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/pservers-pattern-0
   2-f.svg

     [16] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/pservers-pattern-02-f.svg

   ED: masking-path-11-b
   ... is ok
   ... pservers-patter-02

   <ed>
   [17]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/script-specify-01-
   f.svg

     [17] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/script-specify-01-f.svg

   ED: is ok
   ... script-specify-01
   ... this one
   ... I'm not sure if anyone passes this test
   ... Opera fails, Safari fails, Firefox files
   ... I'm wondering if this is a good test
   ... might be a good test to leave in reviewed status
   ... Might be a good scenario to change the spec

   PD: I agree
   ... leave it as is

   <ed>
   [18]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/script-specify-02-
   f.svg

     [18] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/script-specify-02-f.svg

   ED: script-specify-02
   ... that one at least has some passes
   ... that one I would be ok with

   PD: I don't think this one actually has a script

   <ed>
   [19]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/struct-image-16-f.
   svg

     [19] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/struct-image-16-f.svg

   ED: struct-image-16
   ... I think that is fine
   ... and I think that is the last one

   PD: The only issue with that last one
   ... is it only passes in Opera right now

   ED: Lets see what Batik does
   ... Batik passes that one
   ... not really that complex. It's just making sure to load the
   resources in referenced images

   <scribe> ACTION: Erik to Go through the tests that have been
   accepted in the telcon and change their status and check their
   reference images [recorded in
   [20]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-svg-minutes.html#action01]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-2885 - Go through the tests that have been
   accepted in the telcon and change their status and check their
   reference images [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-10-28].

   ED: It would be nice if we had some results to discuss at TPAC
   ... I'm pretty busy, not sure if I'll get time

   PD: Is there a template to fill out the test results?

   AG: Yes, it's in the status directory

   <adrianba> is this the template:
   [21]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/full_implementa
   tion_query.xml

     [21] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/full_implementation_query.xml

   ED: Yes that's the one

   PD: I'd like to start to get them done

   ED: If I have 30 mins or something now, I could get all those tests
   that we discussed today
   ... fixed
   ... then AG can re-run the scripts to generate the templates
   ... It will probably be a good idea to have one of the harnesses
   prepared
   ... I can probably do that
   ... and check that in as separate directory
   ... and do one of the harnesses
   ... which one do you prefer?

   PD: No preference

   ED: Ok I'll just pick one
   ... just to include all the tests that are just in accepted status

TPAC

   DS: I think that there is a very strong probability that disruption
   will clear up by the time TPAC is on

   trackbot, end telcon

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: Erik to Go through the tests that have been accepted
   in the telcon and change their status and check their reference
   images [recorded in
   [22]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-svg-minutes.html#action01]

   [End of minutes]
     _________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [23]scribe.perl version 1.135
    ([24]CVS log)
    $Date: 2010/10/21 20:33:29 $
     _________________________________________________________

     [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

   [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20
Check for newer version at [25]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002
/scribe/

     [25] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/construction/disruption/
Found Scribe: anthony
Inferring ScribeNick: anthony
Found ScribeNick: anthony
Default Present: Shepazu, [IPcaller], ed, pdengler, adrianba, anthony
Present: Shepazu [IPcaller] ed pdengler adrianba anthony
Found Date: 21 Oct 2010
Guessing minutes URL: [26]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-svg-minutes.html
People with action items: erik

     [26] http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-svg-minutes.html

   End of [27]scribe.perl diagnostic output]

     [27] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 20:46:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 October 2010 20:46:53 GMT