- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:10:34 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 5:01:35 AM, Cameron wrote: CM> Hi. CM> I’m reviewing some of the Microsoft test submissions. Take CM> styling-pres-05-f as an example. The test is good in that red is used CM> to indicate test failure, but when the test succeeds the shapes (that CM> would otherwise be red if the test failed) are set to fill:none. A totally blank slide tends to be startling. I tend to first assume something went wrong. So in a case like that I would put a green shape behind, that is obscured by red if the test fails. CM> The CM> resulting test slide if the test passes is blank apart from the CVS CM> revision. Do we have test writing guidelines written down somewhere? CM> I’m thinking we should be following rules like: CM> * If any red is showing, the test failed. CM> * If any green is showing and no red is showing, the test passed. CM> * Otherwise, you need to read the pass criteria. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 09:11:11 UTC