W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Browsers and ECMAscript editions

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:20:10 +0200
Message-ID: <384046958.20100811152010@w3.org>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, 'Oliver Hunt' <oliver@apple.com>, SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 3:18:10 PM, Maciej wrote:

MS> Going back to the actual topic of this thread, I do think it
MS> would be appropriate to cite ECMA-262 5th edition.

Yes, that seemed to be the consensus view and is what the current editor's draft does.


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 13:23:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:12 UTC