- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:24:05 +0100
- To: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au, public-svg-wg@w3.org
The test looks fine to me too. /Erik On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:12:17 +0100, Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au> wrote: > Hi WG, > > I've reviewed this test and it seems fine to me. This test is now ready > to be approved. Can we go ahead with approving the test and removing the > draft watermark? > > Cheers, > > Anthony > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg painting-marker-06-f.svg,1.4,1.5 > Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:03:28 +0000 > Resent-From: member-svg-editors@w3.org > Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:03:25 +0000 > From: Anthony Grasso via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org> > To: member-svg-editors@w3.org > > Update of /sources/public/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg > In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv24728 > > Modified Files: > painting-marker-06-f.svg > Log Message: > Reviewed test. Changed status to "reviewed" > -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 08:18:17 UTC