W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: SVG 1.1F2 testsuite update

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:05:14 -0500
Message-ID: <4B8B04BA.5010305@w3.org>
To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Erik-

Thanks to you and Anthony for doing this tedious but critical work.

What are the next steps to moving this forward?

Regards-
-Doug

Erik Dahlstrom wrote (on 2/28/10 5:57 PM):
>
> Hello svg-wg,
>
> I've just finished my run over the 1.1F2 testsuite, fixing a bunch of
> issues in the process. I've noted some of the still unfixed things below.
>
> General comments:
> - The old testcase descriptions are not up-to-date with the new template,
> we need to decide how to proceed.
> - We need a disclaimer somewhere for the tests that are in draft status,
> on main page maybe? Or on each page that contains a draft test?
> - Note to self: I made a few mistakes when checking in some of the new
> references, I need to make sure they all have the -kb flag.
>
> animate-elem-24-t.svg
> seems to have lost its svgfont in the template converstion process
>
> animate-elem-42-t.svg
> animate-elem-43-t.svg
> animate-elem-45-t.svg
> animate-elem-47 - up to ...51-t.svg
> empty tests
>
> animate-elem-60-t
> reference image should probably show all rects as green, so needs
> patchimage
>
> animate-elem-77-t.svg
> needs italic and bold faces for the SVGFreeSans svgfont
>
> color-prop-04-t.svg
> color-prop-05-t.svg
> is accepted but has the draft mark
>
> conform-viewers-01-t.svg
> needs reference image
>
> coords-viewattr-01-b.svg
> needs reference image, needs imagepatch
>
> filters-blend-01-b.svg
> wrong scale on viewbox? both svg and reference wrong
>
> filters-color-02-b.svg
> filters-conv-02-f.svg
> filters-light-02-f.svg
> reference has draft mark, but otherwise looks ok
>
> filters-felem-02-f.svg
> filters-offset-02-b.svg
> needs imagepatch
>
> filters-turb-02-f.svg
> no reference image checked in
>
> fonts-kern-01-t.svg
> svgfonts missing, conversion problem probably
>
> interact-pevents-01-b.svg
> interact-pevents-02-t.svg
> interact-pevents-03-t.svg
> interact-pevents-04-t.svg
> interact-pevents-05-b.svg
> needs imagepatch
>
> linking-a-06-t.svg
> empty test
>
> painting-marker-06-f.svg
> needs to be reviewed, looks straightforward (passes in ff3.5 and
> opera10.10, fails in safari4)
>
> painting-render-02-b.svg
> draft, needs review by AG
>
> painting-stroke-05-t.svg
> is accepted but still has draft mark, needs pass criteria
>
> painting-stroke-06-t.svg
> is accepted but has draft mark, needs operator script
>
> paths-data-11-t.svg
> empty test
>
> paths-data-16-t.svg
> needs new reference png checked in, looks ok apart from draft mark
>
> paths-dist-01-t.svg
> empty test
>
> paths-dom-01-f.svg
> needs me to finish writing the test, and then review, some browser diffs
> here
>
> pservers-grad-08-b.svg
> seems to have lost the svgfont in the conversion, looks very different
> from the old testsuite image, see
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20061213/htmlEmbedHarness/full-pservers-grad-08-b.html
>
>
> pservers-grad-20-b.svg
> has a correct imagepatch, but the test hasn't been reviewed yet (takers?)
>
> render-elems-06-t.svg
> render-elems-07-t.svg
> render-elems-08-t.svg
> has lost svgfont in conversion
>
> script-specify-01-f.svg
> script-specify-02-f.svg
> needs reviewer, I added the missing draft watermark
>
> struct-dom-04-b.svg
> struct-dom-05-b.svg
> needs to be repaired like struct-dom-02-b.svg and get a similar imagepatch
>
> struct-dom-12-b.svg
> looks ready has been reviewed, I've made a patchimage, can it be marked as
> accepted?
>
> styling-css-02-b.svg
> styling-css-03-b.svg
> styling-css-04-f.svg
> styling-css-05-b.svg
> styling-css-06-b.svg
> styling-elem-01-b.svg
> styling-pres-01-t.svg
> styling-pres-02-f.svg
> text-align-01-b.svg
> text-align-02-b.svg
> text-align-03-b.svg
> text-align-04-b.svg
> text-align-05-b.svg
> text-align-06-b.svg
> text-align-07-t.svg
> text-align-08-b.svg
> text-altglyph-01-b.svg
> text-altglyph-02-b.svg
> text-dom-01-f.svg
> text-fonts-01-t.svg
> text-fonts-02-t.svg
> text-fonts-03-t.svg
> text-fonts-04-t.svg
> text-intro-01-t.svg
> text-intro-02-t.svg
> text-intro-03-t.svg
> text-intro-04-t.svg
> text-intro-05-t.svg
> text-intro-06-t.svg
> text-path-01-b.svg
> needs reference image
>
> text-deco-01-b.svg
> original should use svgfont instead, reference missing some text because
> of that
>
> text-spacing-01-b.svg
> text-text-01-b.svg
> text-text-03-b.svg
> needs reference image, testcase looks too small, missing viewbox?
>
> text-text-04-t.svg
> needs reference image, broken svgfont
>
> text-text-05-t.svg
> text-text-06-t.svg
> text-tref-01-b.svg
> text-tselect-01-b.svg
> text-tselect-02-f.svg
> text-tspan-01-b.svg
> needs reference image
>
> text-tspan-02-b.svg
> text-ws-03-t.svg
> types-dom-02-f.svg
> types-dom-04-b.svg
> types-dom-05-b.svg
> types-dom-06-f.svg
> needs patchimage + reference image
>
> text-ws-01-t.svg
> text-ws-02-t.svg
> types-dom-01-b.svg
> needs reference image
>
> Cheers
> /Erik
>
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 00:05:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:11 UTC