- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:34:24 +0200
- To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 12:27:51 PM, Erik wrote: ED> Hello svg-wg, ED> time: June 22, 2010, 20.00 UTC [1] ED> phone bridge: +1 617-761-6200 (Zakim) ED> passcode: 7841 I have not had confirmation of the telcon booking change, so we may need to use a temporary conference code this week. ED> irc channel: #svg on irc.w3.org:6665 ED> Please take note of the new telcon time for Tuesday (replaces the Monday ED> telcon time). The telcon time for Thursdays is still the same as before. ED> Agenda: ED> * Publishing SVG 1.1 Published a couple of hours ago http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-SVG11-20100622/ ED> - tracking comments We could use an issue in tracker, or we could maintain some sort of xml document as we have in the past, http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/DoC/Tiny12DoC.html or we could use the W3C last call comment tracker http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/ although documentation is ... scanty. It seems to want a single-page spec but seems unable to handle a long single page spec. Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /afs/w3.org/pub/WWW/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/comments.phi on line 586 I think we need something a bit more robust. ED> * Telcon schedule over the summer My regrets for Thurs 24th, Tues 29th and Thurs 1 July (travel). Starting 16 Aug I will be on travel right up to the Paris f2f and SVG Open. ED> * SVG 1.1 testsuite There are a few open actions and one open issue http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/3 Inkscape contributed an implementation report (or rather, a new harness with images made by inkscape as well as the svg and referece PNG, so someone can go through the harness and collect together an implementation report). ED> * [CSS21] Cascade of SVG presentational attributes ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/4C1A8A47.6060203@inkedblade.net The same somewhat funky language was in 1.1 first edition http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/styling.html#UsingPresentationAttributes The proposed wording for CSS 2.1 looks good to me. The proposed wording for other SVG specs looks a bit short (I would tend to reiterate the important "specificity zero" part) but otherwise good. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 19:34:39 UTC