Hello public-svg-wg, There is an ambiguity in the 1.1 SE spec, which says http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/fonts.html#GlyphElement The graphics that make up the ‘glyph’ can be either a single path data specification within the ‘d’ attribute or arbitrary SVG as content within the ‘glyph’. (not the "either" but also says If the ‘glyph’ has both a ‘d’ attribute and child elements, the ‘d’ attribute is rendered first, and then the child elements. I believe that some implementations ignore child elements if there is a d attribute. (This ambiguity is the subject of a current errata item). Suggested fix: The graphics that make up the ‘glyph’ can be a single path data specification within the ‘d’ attribute, arbitrary SVG as child content within the ‘glyph’, or both. If we agree, I will update the SE text. Also, child elements of glyph are untested in the test suite. Doug and I discussed this on the phone earlier and came up with several things that should be tested. I plan to ad some to the test suite over the next week or two and will add them into the wiki as they are done. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Thursday, 10 September 2009 13:05:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 September 2009 13:05:43 GMT