W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

[Fwd: Re: Transforms Coordination]

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:37:45 -0400
Message-ID: <49C177B9.8060403@w3.org>
To: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Forwarded.  These WG-only lists are a pain.

-------- Original Message --------
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:20:33 -0700
To: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Subject: Re: Transforms Coordination
Cc: CSS WG <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, Philippe 
Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>

At 18:07  -0400 18/03/09, L. David Baron wrote:
>On Wednesday 2009-03-18 15:01 -0400, Doug Schepers wrote:
>>  As you know, the SVG WG want to have a long-term collaboration with you
>>  on a number of topics, including the Transforms specifications.
>>  Dean Jackson raised the idea of merging the SVG and CSS Transform
>>  specifications (at least 3D) [1] (noted in our Tracker as ISSUE-2234)
>>  [2], which has some merit and some points for caution.  The best thing
>>  to do at this point may be to create a joint Task Force.  Even if we end
>>  up with separate specs, at the very least a TF will serve as a medium
>>  for collaboration.
>>  Is the CSS WG open to the idea of a joint CSS-SVG Transforms Task Force?
>>   Obviously, I think all parties would want it to be a public group.
>What problems exist that such a task force is needed to solve?  It
>seems best to start off with less process (i.e., just send some
>email) until more is believed to be needed.

having a singe mailing-list, rather than cross-posting, and therefore
having the email subject lines also appropriately tagged as being of
'joint' interest - that's one.

David Singer
Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.

-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:37:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:10 UTC