W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: transforms comments

From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:28:42 +1100
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <F58E42A4-5223-4A81-94BA-EC2B662FF9CA@apple.com>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>

On 12/03/2009, at 7:59 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:

>
>
>> it would be good if the SVG
>> proposal was in an equivalent state. I think putting editorial notes
>> into the document would be enough.
>
> That seems fair.  Anthony, can you put in notes regarding open  
> issues into the spec?  Dean, I guess you'll be incorporating our  
> feedback in a similar manner?

I think there is a big difference between my feedback and your  
feedback. I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but there are significant  
flaws in the current SVG approach, whereas your comments on CSS were  
on specific functionality. I've responded to the SVG comments in  
detail on the public list, and will definitely incorporate the  
suggestions indicated in the feedback. For the ones I disagree with,  
they'll remain as open issues (I'll set up the issue tracking once  
there is a published draft to track). I don't want to change the  
current draft at the moment unless it is related to pubrules (and I'm  
out-of-the-loop wrt publication unless Bert contacts me).

> When does the CSS WG plan to publish, at this point?  The SVG WG  
> doesn't think you need to incorporate all our feedback, if that  
> delays publication.  We would rather publish faster, and then  
> coordinate based on public feedback.

Right, this isn't a big deal.

Dean
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 21:29:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 11 March 2009 21:29:26 GMT