W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: ISSUE-2222 (test-coverage-elts-11): Missing test coverage for SVG 1.1 elements [SVG Full 1.1]

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:04:02 +0100
Message-ID: <581195011.20090216230402@w3.org>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Monday, February 16, 2009, 10:57:32 PM, Cameron wrote:

CM> Chris Lilley:
>> foreignObject is an extensibility point for things not covered by the
>> SVG specification (like HTML, for example). How would you propose
>> testing it, since by definition its for things outside the scope of
>> the specification?

CM> I’d propose testing all of the things that don’t require support for a
CM> particular extension (e.g. ensuring the x/y/width/height/transform/
CM> xlink:href/etc. attributes work and are animatable).

Yes, that would be good.

We could also test for something that should *not* be supported (eg requiredExtensions="http://example.com/completelyBogus" )


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 22:04:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 February 2009 22:04:18 GMT