W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: ISSUE-2203 (colorprofile-local-erratum): color-profile "local" IDL attribute erratum incorrect [SVG Full 1.1]

From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:39:57 +1100
Message-ID: <497E3BBD.9080808@cisra.canon.com.au>
To: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>

Hi WG,

I had the ACTION-2409 [1] to remove the color-profile "local" IDL attribute 
erratum from SVG 1.1 errata.

This action is now complete and closed. Is it ok to close off ISSUE-2203 which 
is associated to the action?

Thanks,

Anthony



SVG Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
> ISSUE-2203 (colorprofile-local-erratum): color-profile "local" IDL attribute erratum incorrect [SVG Full 1.1]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2203
> 
> Raised by: Cameron McCormack
> On product: SVG Full 1.1
> 
>>From <http://www.w3.org/mid/20090116032239.GB3580@arc.mcc.id.au>:
> 
> We have an erratum to unescape the “local” attribute on SVGColorProfileElement in SVG 1.1:
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#svgcolorprofileelement-idl-attribute-local
> 
> I was mistaken when I reported that issue.  “local” is indeed a reserved
> word in OMG IDL, and needs to be escape here with an underscore.  I
> think we should remove the erratum.
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 22:40:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 January 2009 22:40:45 GMT