W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Rev should not be added to SVG

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:38:46 +1100
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090109013846.GC853@arc.mcc.id.au>

Hi Chris.

Chris Lilley:
> ACTION-2188
> Ask Tantek for advice on adding rev
> 
> The information is already covered in the microformats FAQ: 
> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-faq#Then_what_does_rev_mean
> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-faq#Should_rev_even_be_used
> 
>   Should 'rev' even be used?
…
>   The short answer is unfortunately "NO". Use of "rev" SHOULD be
>   avoided.
> 
>   However, VoteLinks' use of rev has been grandfathered since it was
>   such an early use.

> Subject: Re: Rev should not be added to SVG

@rev was already added to SVG Tiny 1.2.  Should we remove it?

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 01:39:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 January 2009 01:39:50 GMT