- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:12:42 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Friday, May 8, 2009, 4:26:36 AM, Cameron wrote: CM> Cameron McCormack: >> I’ve rewritten the ECMAScript Language Binding appendix to be a bit >> clearer, but still without the strict conformance requirements that >> using Web IDL would entail. CM> A related question: why is this appendix not normative? In the CM> Conformance Criteria appendix, it says: CM> Specific criteria that apply to only Conforming Dynamic SVG Viewers: CM> … CM> * The viewer must have complete support for an ECMAScript binding of CM> the SVG Document Object Model [ECMA-262]. CM> Shouldn’t we be requiring a particular ECMAScript binding of the SVG DOM CM> (i.e., the one we have in the ECMAScript Language Binding appendix)? CM> Otherwise the tests in the test suite that use script have nothing to CM> stand on. I agree. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Saturday, 9 May 2009 18:12:52 UTC