Cyril Concolato: > Actually, I have no definite opinion on this one. I just thought it > needed clarifications either way. If the behavior in HTML is that a same > script can be run multiple times, then I'm fine. I made the initial > proposal the other way because I thought that if you load twice the same > script then you may have 2 (same) definitions of a function and I thought > this would be a problem. OK. > I can't download the example from the above URL. Could you check if > the URL is correct? Ah yes, it helps if I check it in. It’s there now. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 08:14:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 October 2008 08:14:07 GMT