W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Minor problem with struct-image-04-t.svg

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:56:56 -0400
Message-ID: <48F93458.9000507@w3.org>
To: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
CC: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au, public-svg-wg@w3.org

Hi, Alex-

Thanks for noticing those.  I just did a global find/replace for
'image/jpg'/'image/jpeg', with the following results:

test/svg/animate-elem-39-t.svg
test/svg/animate-elem-40-t.svg
test/svg/media-video-212-t.svg
test/svggen/animate-elem-39-t.svg
test/svggen/animate-elem-40-t.svg
test/svggen/coords-viewattr-05-t.svg
test/svggen/media-video-212-t.svg
test/svggen/struct-image-04-t.svg

The svggen ones probably didn't need it, but what the hey?

Regards-
-Doug

Alex Danilo wrote (on 10/17/08 8:19 PM):
> Hi Anothony,
> 
> --Original Message--:
>>Dude,
>>
>>Alex Danilo wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> 
>>> 	It seems struct-image-04-t.svg suffers from the same Internet
>>> Media Type problem in inline data: URIs. The type again is 'image/jpg'
>>> for the first image, where it should be 'image/jpeg'.
>>> 
>>
>>Nice find! Easy fix as well.
>>
>>> 	I know everyone's busy, but if possible it would be nice to get
>>> that test fixed as well.
>>> 
>>
>>Yup, no worries - done!
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Also noticed the same issue with:
> animate-elem-39-t.svg
> animate-elem-40-t.svg
> media-video-212-t.svg
> 
> Although the last one is in a 'type' attribute so not as bad
> as the others. But it should really get corrected.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 18 October 2008 00:57:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 October 2008 00:57:11 GMT