W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: ISSUE-2144 (buffered-rendering v static): 'buffered-rendering' property vs 'static' [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ]

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:50:25 +0200
Message-ID: <48F44131.3090006@enst.fr>
To: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>

SVG Working Group Issue Tracker a écrit :
> 
> ISSUE-2144 (buffered-rendering v static): 'buffered-rendering' property vs 'static' [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2144
> 
> Raised by: Doug Schepers
> On product: Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny 
> 
> Cyril Concolato
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0110.html>:
> [[
> * Section 11.10.5 The 'buffered-rendering' property 
> What is the relationship between SVG T 1.2 'buffered-rendering' attribute and the SVG Full 1.2 rendering hints (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20041027/painting.html#sprites) cache/static/snap ? 
The purpose of this comment was to highlight the fact that the earlier draft of Full 1.2 had similar attributes and to make sure they were not conflicting. There is no particular action to take for this comment since the latest draft of 1.2 Full is empty. At most, we could add the following note in Tiny: "Future SVG specifications may consider refining this hint."

Cyril
-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Département Traitement du Signal et Images
/Dept. Signal and Image Processing
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat 
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 06:51:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 October 2008 06:51:15 GMT