W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: ISSUE-2132 (confusing attribute definitions): Attribute definitions are confusing [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ]

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:08:00 +0200
Message-ID: <48F43740.3020905@enst.fr>
To: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>

Hi all,

SVG Working Group Issue Tracker a écrit :
> 
> ISSUE-2132 (confusing attribute definitions): Attribute definitions are confusing [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2132
> 
> Raised by: Doug Schepers
> On product: Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny 
> 
> Cyril Concolato
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0110.html>:
> [[
> * section 5.2 The 'g' element
> In general, the way "attribute definitions" are given is confusing. For example, if one does not understand RNG (and dig into all RNG snippets), it will think the g element only has the focusable attribute and the navigation attributes 
> 
> Also, the general syntax sometimes is confusing:  
> for example:
> preserveAspectRatio = "[defer] <align> [<meet>]"  
> should rather be something like:
> preserveAspectRatio = ["defer"] <align> [<meet>]
> There are several examples in this case.
Except for this precise edit, I don't have precise edits for all the other attributes definition and this would maybe require too much work. If you think so, you can ignore the comment.

Cyril

-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Département Traitement du Signal et Images
/Dept. Signal and Image Processing
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat 
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 06:08:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 October 2008 06:08:47 GMT