W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

ISSUE-2146 (event dispatching contradictions): Contradictions in event dispatching [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ]

From: SVG Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:40:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20081013174027.C63DC4DD62@crusher.w3.org>


ISSUE-2146 (event dispatching contradictions): Contradictions in event dispatching [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ]

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2146

Raised by: Doug Schepers
On product: Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny 

Cyril Concolato
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0110.html>:
[[
* Section 13.8 Event dispatching
The following 2 sentences seem contradictory. According to the first sentence, there is always at least the root as a target. Could you clarify?
"If the user agent cannot find a graphics element or SVGElementInstance object to be the target object (e.g., the pointer event occurs over the viewport background), then the user agent must set the target object to be the rootmost 'svg' element."
and 
"If there is no target object, the event is not dispatched."


]]
Received on Monday, 13 October 2008 17:41:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 13 October 2008 17:41:02 GMT