Erik Dahlström: > > In SVG 1.1 the 'correspondingUseElement' is of type 'SVGUseElement' [1]. > > In tiny it's of type 'SVGElement' [2]. > > > > The uDOM currently doesn't have the SVGUseElement interface, but I > > think it might be more consistent if we introduced it as an empty > > interface inheriting from SVGElement. Doug Schepers: > Seems reasonable to me. Me too. Note that JSR 287 declares correspondingUseElement to be of type SVGElement, but this wouldn’t cause any existing code not to compile. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 00:04:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 25 September 2008 00:04:40 GMT