RE: uDOM changes for Global/AbstractView/etc.


Cameron McCormack:
> There’s no content that affects me personally, so yes in principle I
> would be in favour of dropping SVGDocument::global.  Niklas, Lee and/or
> Andrew (CCed) would likely have a better idea than me on whether the
> existing content is easily changed at this stage.

The content I'm referring to is third party code, so it is out of our reach. This will cause problems with customers that rely on our backward compatibility. Also future content would have to be configured differently depending on the version of Player it is supposed to run on.

/Niklas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au]
> Sent: den 8 september 2008 11:11
> To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
> Cc: Niklas Hagelroth; lee.martineau@quickoffice.com; atemmons@rogers.com
> Subject: Re: uDOM changes for Global/AbstractView/etc.
> 
> Erik Dahlström:
> > Right, so what I'm really asking is:
> >
> >   Is it really impossible to make the change global->defaultView now,
> >   to save us the pain later on?
> >
> > Ok, there may be some content already. However, the content would
> > still work if changed to use defaultView, with the additional benefit
> > of having it work in browsers too.
> 
> There’s no content that affects me personally, so yes in principle I
> would be in favour of dropping SVGDocument::global.  Niklas, Lee and/or
> Andrew (CCed) would likely have a better idea than me on whether the
> existing content is easily changed at this stage.
> 
> --
> Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 12:36:37 UTC