Hmm, could be something SVG Print related?... Might want to double check with Chris. Anthony Cameron McCormack wrote: > The <xslt-qname> type definition doesn’t seem to be used anywhere. It > has a definition in the schema (in relaxng/datatypes.rng), but this > isn’t referenced by any of the other schema files. > > It also seems to have a normative reference to XSLT 1.0 in its > description, but XSLT 1.0 is listed only as an informative reference in > the References appendix. > > Unless there are objections, I’m going to remove it from the types > chapter and the schema. >Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 06:58:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 8 August 2008 06:58:14 GMT