W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: d:OperatorScript vs OperatorScript

From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:05:37 +1000
Message-ID: <4832CCA1.6090500@cisra.canon.com.au>
To: Andreas Neumann <a.neumann@carto.net>
CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org

Hi Andreas,

Correct. We should be using the test description that uses the following

<d:OperatorScript 
xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/2000/02/svg/testsuite/description/" 
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>

       </p>
       <p>

       </p>
</d:OperatorScript>

Thanks,

Anthony


Andreas Neumann wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed that there are two versions for the test description in the 
> SVG 1.2T Testsuite:
> 
> some tests use <d:OperatorScript> and not xhtml namespace inside (the 
> majority), some use <OperatorScript> and a xhtml namespace inside (the 
> minority).
> 
> Is the version with the "d" namespace the correct version?
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 13:06:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 May 2008 13:06:23 GMT