public-svg-issues@w3.org from April 2019 by author

Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Public test suite? (#680) (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Some useful style properties do not have corresponding style attributes (#679) (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• [svgwg] getBBox algorithm doesn't factor in child transforms (#673) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: getBBox algorithm doesn't factor in child transforms (#673) marked as Co-ordinates chapter (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Add SVG Native as an Editor's Draft (#663) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by AmeliaBR (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: [svg-native] Add SVG Native as an Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Consider adding masking support (#659) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Preserving document semantics should be an explicit non-goal (#660) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Rebase on top of SVG 2 (#661) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Spec uses "deleted", "removed" and "forbidden" interchangeably (#662) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: Native profile of SVG (#657) marked as svg-native (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Saturday, 13 April)

Cameron McCormack via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Tuesday, 30 April)
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by heycam (Tuesday, 30 April)
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by heycam (Tuesday, 30 April)
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by heycam (Tuesday, 30 April)

Chris Lilley via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Should we provide a validator? (#674) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should a browser do when it encounters one of these files (#665) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] inner svg, symbol or use elements supported? (#671) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider adding masking support (#659) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Spec uses "deleted", "removed" and "forbidden" interchangeably (#662) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Monday, 15 April)

CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Monday, 29 April)

Dean Jackson via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Wednesday, 17 April)

Dirk Schulze via GitHub

• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Some useful style properties do not have corresponding style attributes (#679) marked as SVG Native (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should a browser do when it encounters one of these files (#665) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] inner svg, symbol or use elements supported? (#671) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] How should currentColor be handled? (#678) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Should declarations be required to be before all their uses? (#669) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Limited support for filters? (#675) marked as SVG Native (Wednesday, 17 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Should we provide a validator? (#674) marked as SVG Native (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Limited support for filters? (#675) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] What should a browser do when it encounters one of these files (#665) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Support out-of-sRGB colors (#666) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] "SVG Native" isn't a great name (#667) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Consider supporting CSS Variables (#668) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Should declarations be required to be before all their uses? (#669) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] inner svg, symbol or use elements supported? (#671) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] inner svg, symbol or use elements supported? (#671) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) marked as SVG Native (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting CSS Variables (#668) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider adding masking support (#659) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [animation] transforms attr on paths referenced by mpath are ignored (#656) marked as SVG Animations (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Saturday, 13 April)
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by dirkschulze (Saturday, 13 April)

Florian Rivoal via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Saturday, 13 April)

François Daoust via GitHub

• [svgwg] [svg2] "edit:excludefromidl" inconsistently applied during build (#676) (Wednesday, 17 April)

Jarek Foksa via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Saturday, 13 April)

Max Nordlund via GitHub

• [svgwg] member-svg-media-type@w3.org is no longer active (#655) (Friday, 5 April)
• [svgwg] Typo in SVG media registration appendix (#654) (Friday, 5 April)

Myles C. Maxfield via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Some useful style properties do not have corresponding style attributes (#679) (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Public test suite? (#680) (Monday, 29 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Public test suite? (#680) marked as SVG Native (Monday, 29 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Public test suite? (#680) (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Should we provide a validator? (#674) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] inner svg, symbol or use elements supported? (#671) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] support xlink:href on gradients (#670) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Should declarations be required to be before all their uses? (#669) (Thursday, 18 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] How should currentColor be handled? (#678) marked as SVG Native (Thursday, 18 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] How should currentColor be handled? (#678) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Closed: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Thursday, 18 April)
• [svgwg] Issue: [svg-native] Support for font variations? (#677) marked as SVG Native (Thursday, 18 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for font variations? (#677) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Limited support for filters? (#675) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Should we provide a validator? (#674) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Should we provide a validator? (#674) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Support for XML entities/CDATA required? (#672) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Should declarations be required to be before all their uses? (#669) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Should declarations be required to be before all their uses? (#669) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting CSS Variables (#668) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting CSS Variables (#668) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting CSS Variables (#668) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting CSS Variables (#668) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Add SVG Native as an Editor's Draft (#663) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] "SVG Native" isn't a great name (#667) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Support out-of-sRGB colors (#666) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] What should a browser do when it encounters one of these files (#665) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: [svg-native] Add SVG Native as an Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Spec uses "deleted", "removed" and "forbidden" interchangeably (#662) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Rebase on top of SVG 2 (#661) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Preserving document semantics should be an explicit non-goal (#660) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider adding masking support (#659) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Saturday, 13 April)

Paul LeBeau via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Friday, 19 April)
• [svgwg] [svg-native] Keep in mind that some properties are not style attributes (#679) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Should declarations be required to be before all their uses? (#669) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] What should the file extension be? (#664) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Consider supporting some subset of CSS (#658) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: [svgwg] Native profile of SVG (#657) (Sunday, 14 April)
• [svgwg] [animation] transforms attr on paths referenced by mpath are ignored (#656) (Thursday, 11 April)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2019 23:10:40 UTC