- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 05:07:41 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
If we allow UA to ignore operations within an EGC, and if EGC definition is corrected in future, it will change the rendering, no? I'm fine to take any encoding, as long as operations are limited to EGC as a unit, so I'm not opposed to. But if UAX#29 changes drastically in future, it's not easy to maintain the full backward compat regardless of what we chose here, for this feature or for any other features such as first-letter or line breaker. I think we should consider such changes as an improvement rather than a breakage. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/537#issuecomment-434173831 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2018 05:07:42 UTC