- From: Dirk Schulze via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 07:14:51 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
@AmeliaBR i think we intentionally did not include symbols (and IIRC use) and added that to the progressive list of things where they potentially apply to in the future. Similar to patterns for instance. The definition of graphics element does not include the two mentioned elements either. I’d rather go with the current definition in the Geometry Poroperties section but would be fine adding a note that a future spec may include graphical reference elements, symbol or use. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dirkschulze Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/525#issuecomment-433597909 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2018 07:14:52 UTC