- From: Cameron McCormack via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 04:49:05 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
It is possible I've misread the spec. I was going based on this from the same section: > With the exception of the ‘foreignObject’ element, the back to front stacking order for a stacking context created by an SVG element is: > > 1. the background and borders of the element forming the stacking context, if any > 2. child stacking contexts created by descendants with negative stack levels, primarily ordered by most negative first, then by tree order > 3. descendants with 'z-index: auto' or 'z-index: 0', in tree order > 4. child stacking contexts created by descendants with positive stack levels, primarily ordered by lowest index first, then by tree order and mentally substituting "non-negative stack levels" for "positive stack levels" in step 4. But I think I was wrong to do that, as stack level zero elements would be handled in step 3. The key thing here is that step 3 includes both elements that do and do not induce stacking contexts, which I missed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by heycam Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/463#issuecomment-390093571 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 18 May 2018 04:49:18 UTC