Re: [svgwg] Implicit and allowed roles for SVG element in a HTML document

@dstorey Not wrong!

The SVG-AAM needs a republication (I'm working on it!) to match what's in HTML-AAM and SVG2.  The version David linked to is the Editor's Draft (updated); the TR version is out of date.

If ARIA in HTML still has the old mapping, it also needs an update.

There has been some discussion (in https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/issues/43) about whether the `graphics-document` mapping should automatically simplify to an `img` mapping when the element does not have any accessible children. However, the same rules would apply for both the SVG with CSS layout box (the one that's a direct child of HTML) and a nested SVG.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/372#issuecomment-375702243 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 15:26:11 UTC