Re: [svgwg] pathLength does not affect percentage calculations

The Working Group just discussed `pathLength PR`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;AmeliaBR> Topic: pathLength PR<br>
&lt;AmeliaBR> gitHub: https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/485<br>
&lt;liam> [are we on 485 or https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/383 ? ]<br>
&lt;liam> AmeliaBR, in most cases differences in path length adjustment will cancel out, but we have a special rule about handling path length of zero<br>
&lt;liam> and for a +ve length you go to the end of the path instead of the beginning<br>
&lt;liam> so the only change is to say that doesn't affect MISSED<br>
&lt;liam> Eric: any +ve non-% length goes to the end of the path<br>
&lt;AmeliaBR> s/MISSED/percentage length values/<br>
&lt;liam> Dirk: if that's implemnt behaviour it's fine with be<br>
&lt;liam> AmeliaBR: Eric - are there  tests for the changes?<br>
&lt;liam> Eric: there were non-percent path lengths,haven't done zero with % but i'll add them now<br>
&lt;liam> AmeliaBR: need a review, ok with me<br>
&lt;ericwilligers> Any positive non-percentage lengths goes to the end of the path.<br>
&lt;liam> Eric: new proposal (see preceding IRC line)<br>
&lt;ericwilligers> Percentages resolve to 0 when pathLength is 0<br>
&lt;liam> Dirk: for 0 you'd get the end of the path but percentages resolve to zero<br>
&lt;ericwilligers> 0 is always the start of the path.<br>
&lt;liam> AmeliaBR: these are all edge cases anyway<br>
&lt;liam> Eric: I'll send a new pr and tests.<br>
&lt;ericwilligers> https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/484<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/485#issuecomment-403598138 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 9 July 2018 19:47:13 UTC