Re: [svgwg] Establish SVG 2 test suite

The Working Group just discussed `Establish SVG 2 test suite`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;Chris__> Topic: Establish SVG 2 test suite<br>
&lt;Chris__> github: https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/269<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: very old issue. And we have a test suite<br>
&lt;Chris__> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/master/svg/shapes/rect-01.svg<br>
&lt;krit> krit: Liam wanted us to clarify that we indeed have a test suite and that we also have guidelines<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: has examples and assets that can be used. All similar like for CSS WG test suite.<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: also, Peter Lins test tools can create test results. Need to check if we can reuse.<br>
&lt;krit> liam: put it on the agenda... came up for Agenda+... ppl look for tests likely find this issue.<br>
&lt;Chris__> https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/wiki/Testing<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: we need to do more what we want the web platform tests look like and add requirements for review and approval<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: we all agreed on UWT framework<br>
&lt;krit> s/UWT/WPT/<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: we should get come down to what we are actually using.<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: we need to look at secure vs interactive environment. Need to design how we structure the tests for that.<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: we need a set of tests SVG referencing SVG tests and also HTML based reference tests<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: we have the core SVG markup tests but want to easily test on inlining the markup also.<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: what happens if you reference SVG as object or as image and so on.<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: we do have a few open PRs that need to get reviewed.<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: should we keep the issue open until we are done or close it because we have the test suite.<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: I think we should keep the issue open because we do not have a central place for how to write and run tests.<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: Think Nico wants this to be a meta-issue for references<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: but we can take Agenda+ off<br>
&lt;Chris__> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4015<br>
&lt;krit> ...discussions about inconsistencies on writing tests on the linked PR.<br>
&lt;Chris__> https://reviewable.io/reviews/w3c/web-platform-tests/4015<br>
&lt;krit> krit: should those tests reference masking spec?<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: how much of masking is still in SVG2?<br>
&lt;krit> krit: should all be part of CSS Masking<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: we should also keep tests for SVG as well.<br>
&lt;BogdanBrinza> I'm late - just joined<br>
&lt;krit> AmeliaBR: we have a page with properties that are defined by other specs. We should have sVG specific tests for those properties.<br>
&lt;AmeliaBR> https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/styling.html#RequiredProperties<br>
&lt;krit> krit: I would just like to add that a test can reference multiple specs. So those property tests should reference the spec defining them + SVG.<br>
&lt;krit> Chris__: we seem to make progress.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/269#issuecomment-361370185 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 29 January 2018 20:08:51 UTC