- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:55:12 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
Thanks for finding that link, Paul. Also thanks for the better demo. I guess my brain still thinks better in "up" vs "down" than "in the direction of the positive X-axis". But the latter version is what's important for markers. However, your "ideal" solution seems to assume that there is an obvious directionality to the path as a whole. What about a talon-shape, where the curve backtracks. At the exact point of tangent, there is no obvious directionality: incoming and outgoing paths cancel out. [Another demo](https://codepen.io/AmeliaBR/pen/5d110b7d5902ae8cd3631f9d5f79cc00/) > I am sure we are spending an unnecessary amount of time thinking about something no-one will ever notice, but... I noticed this in a demo I was making, when I opened it up in a different browser & things were completely different. It's one of those things where I don't really care one way or the other, just so long as everyone is consistent! About the only thing I'm going to argue for is that mirror-reflected path definitions should have mirror-reflected marker orientations. (AKA, Firefox is wrong). -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/333#issuecomment-315813515 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 17 July 2017 16:55:19 UTC